According to Wikipedia, bridal showers were originally organized by the bridesmaids of a bride who lacked a dowry either because her family could not afford it or because the head of her family chose not to provide it. A shower was therefore a way for a couple of limited means to obtain the items needed to set up in married life. Fast forward a hundred years and bridal showers are still held but instead of providing necessary items they have become a grotesque display of consumerism.
Saturday morning I found myself standing in the gadget corner of Williams & Sonoma on 7th and 17th. I was searching for a present to take to a bridal shower that I was attending later that day. The friend I was purchasing present loves to cook, so we had all been given the directive to get her something for her kitchen. As I stared at the array of choppers, graters, tomato slicers and specialty can openers, I was hard pressed to find any item that my friend really needed. Eventually I settled on a contraption that stored herbs in a water bath so that they last longer. I got it because I assumed that no one else would get something like it and it was so strange, my friend was unlikely to already have one at home.
I enjoy buying presents for people and I think that life should be celebrated. For this reason I was glad that I attended my friend's bridal shower, I'm glad that I got to see her mom for the first time in years and meet friends from other parts of her life. What I could have done without was the hour we all spent watching the bride-to-be unwrap ALL her presents. The copious number of presents was overwhelming, and not in a good way. There were candlesticks and crystal-ware, negligees and silk gowns, baking dishes and cupcake mix. While all of the goods were lovely and kindly meant, watching the display I couldn't help but wonder what proportion of these gifts would ever be used. If 50 percent made it back to the bride's apartment, I doubt it if 20 percent would actually be used on a regular basis. Who needs a cupcake caddy?!
Bridal showers are no longer an event where we spend money to support the happy couple in their new lives, they are now an event where we spend money in an effort to prove how much we love and appreciate the couple and they in turn can gauge their worth by the number of presents they receive. I don't mean to unfairly target the soon-to-be married, instead I think they are representative of our society. When children go trick or treating on Halloween, they greedily grab as much candy as their hands can hold, more than they can possibly eat. At Christmas and Hanukkah, kids argue that if they are really loved, they will get their chosen present. Adults are hardly much better with anniversaries and birthdays marking high expectations that require high spending as well.
Is this madness coming from our own insecurities? Is it a product of mass media? Is this just a sign of the luxury in which we live? Whatever it's source, I can't help but wish we could go back to the good old days when it was the thought that counted.
Even Miss Cali is entitled to her opinion, because it's just that!
I must be a bit behind the times because I have only just heard of this to-do over the Miss USA pageant. Perez Hilton, gossip-blogger, F-list celebrity and an openly gay man, was a guest judge at the pageant. As such, he was allowed to pose a question to one of contestants during the question and answer portion of the show when the contestants try and prove that they are not just pretty faces, they actually have the acumen to realize how important it is to talk about world peace. Hilton asked Miss California (who was apparently considered a front-runner in the competition) what she thought about gay marriage, namely did she think that the relatively recent legalization of gay marriage in several states was something that should be expanded to other states.
Miss California's response was that she had been raised in household where marriage was defined as being between a man and a woman and so that is what she believed. She actually doesn't say whether she thinks gay marriage should be made legal or more states or less and yet the gay community (most notably, Perez Hilton) has found a new image to hate and Christian conservatives (i.e. Fox News) have found a new person to love and many in the press and pointing to her homophobic answer and saying that that is where she lost the competition to become Miss USA.
Aren't we missing the point here? Wasn't this country founded on the separation of Church and State...that is, we can control what is legal and illegal but those definitions should not be influenced by our own personal beliefs. I almost feel as though those on the Right believe that if gay marriage is legalized in their state, THEY will be forced into one. Of course that is not what happens, the legislation doesn't even force churches to open their doors to gay couples. What it does do, is make a civil union legal between two members of the same sex who are choosing a particular lifestyle.
Miss California is entitled to believe what she wants to believe. The way her response was interpreted as 'she is not in favor of legalizing gay marriage' is part of the problem. Those in favor of gay marriage need to stop making it an issue of homophobia and instead make it an issue of equality. If we need an example we can look at Canada, they have legalized gay marriage and there have been no sightings of the four horsemen of the apocalypse.
Posted at 11:57 AM in Cultural Commentary | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)